Legal Opinion

Trunnell v. Tonole

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, C. J.

In May, 1908, the defendant Gr. P. Miller was the owner of a strip of land 30 feet wide and some eight or nine hundred feet long*, lying alongside the right of way of the Oregon-California Railroad then in Douglas County, but now in Lane County owing to a legislative change in the boundaries of the two counties. At that time Miller and his wife conveyed to the defendants Tonole by metes and bounds 500 feet off the east end of the tract. The grantees entered into possession and proceeded to build a house thereon. The undisputed evidence is that they made no survey to locate the boundary line…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flanders v. AumackOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Williams v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Kaston v. StoreyOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Higgs v. McDuffieOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Hexter v. SchneiderOregon Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Monese v. StruveOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  2. McKee v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Hedges v. LysekSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Zerr v. HECETA LODGE NO. 111, IND. ORDER OF ODD F.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. McCreary v. Lake Boulevard Sponge Exchange Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API