First & Final Account of Welles
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 238, Jan. T., 1898, by Emilie Haeberly, from order of C. P. Lackawanna County, March T., 1898, No. 734, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report. Exceptions to auditor’s report.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 238, Jan. T., 1898, by Emilie Haeberly, from order of C. P. Lackawanna County, March T., 1898, No. 734, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report. Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Edwards, J. E. 0. Newcomb, Esq., auditor, reported the facts agreed upon to be as follows : 1. Charles Robinson, August Robinson and William Robinson, on May 13, 1893, entered into a copartnership, under the name, style and title of E. Robinson’s Sons, for a period of five years, which agreement is as follows: “Articles of copartnership, made and concluded this 13th day of May, in the year of our…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Mitchell,
The auditor found that the term of the partnership under its articles had not expired, there had been no formal dissolution or settlement of accounts, there were still some undistributed assets, and one unpaid debt, a mortgage on real estate belonging to the partnership, though held in the name of an individual partner, yet, notwithstanding these circumstances, he found as a fact that the firm had sold its entire plant, equipment and good-will, and by common consent ended its business. This finding was confirmed by the court, and we see no reason to question its…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Foster's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
- Appeal of WentzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chowning v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Kreise v. CartledgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Faust v. HecklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Smith v. FelkelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Shupe v. RaineySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.