Norton v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Justice.
A jury convicted appellant of aggravated sexual assault. The jury found two enhancement allegations true and assessed a fifty-year sentence. Appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to convict him. He also contends that during jury arguments the prosecutor impermissibly commented on appellant’s failure to testify. We find the evidence sufficient to support appellant’s conviction. We conclude that the trial court erred by denying appellant’s motion for mistrial. We hold the instruction to the jury did not cure the harmful effect of the State’s improper comment on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Bonham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Montoya v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
- Crocker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- Trevino v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Knapp v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1997
- Adolph Trevino v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.