Trevino v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Justice.
After the jury found appellant guilty of the offense of indecency with a child by contact, Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11 (West 1994), the trial court set punishment at confinement for forty-two years. Appellant asserts three points of error, contending that the trial court erred in denying appellant: (1) his motion for mistrial after the prosecutor’s argument included a reference to appellant’s failure to testify; (2) his motion to quash the enhancement paragraphs in the indictment; and (3) his right to fully cross-examine a witness. We will sustain appellant’s first point of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Nickens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- State v. LopezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Norton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Crocker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- Edwards v. Aaron Rents, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2006
- Strain v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- Arthur Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- Arthur Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.