Legal Opinion
Stoll v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided July 3, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiskell, J.
This is a suit on a bond executed by the defendant, as surety. The Chancellor rendered a decree in favor of the complainants for $5,000, the amount of the bond and costs.
The case is here on a writ of error, with supersedeas.
On October 25, 1921, complainants filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy in the United States District Court, 'in Mississippi, and in connection therewith, made an offer of composition.
On February 18,-1922, the offer of composition was duly confirmed by the District Judge, and an order to that effect entered. <
On March 18, 1922, certain creditors of the bankrupts filed a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Thomson v. DeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Turley v. TurleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1886
- Walker v. VandiverTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- West v. East Coast Cedar Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cockburn v. Howard Johnson, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- Joy Roy/Sam Dawkins v. W.T. DiamondCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Hubbs v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- City of Newport v. Masengill Auction Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Atchley v. AtchleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.