Legal Opinion

Gargiulo v. Eastern Auto Sales, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 12, 1957Published

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

Although the complaint contained two* counts, we are concerned only with the second, by which the plaintiffs sought to recover the amount, alleged to be due upon a promissory note made by the named defendant and indorsed by the other three defendants. Each of the indorsers averred,, by way of special defense, that when the note fell due it was not presented for payment and was not protested for nonpayment and that neither notice* *414of nonpayment nor notice of protest was given to them. The court rendered judgment for the plaintiffs to recover of the named defendant the amount due on the note,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. HaggardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. Lockwood v. Wilson H. Lee Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  3. Greenstein v. KucharskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API