Lockwood v. Wilson H. Lee Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The amended complaint alleges that the ■plaintiff’s husband, Charles F. Lockwood, while employed by the named defendant, was injured as a ■consequence of the negligence of it and its agent, the ■defendant John Cronan; that her husband incurred a permanent partial or total incapacity; and that as a result of the defendants’ negligence the plaintiff has been, is now, and may in the future be, deprived of the affection, care, assistance, services, support and conjugal relations to which she is entitled by virtue of the marital relationship. She seeks money damages. Each defendant demurred to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Marri v. Stamford Street Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Brown v. Georgia-Tennessee Coaches, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Somers v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Taylor v. KeefeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Whittlesey v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Hopson v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Gentile v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Peter Igneri and Theresa Igneri v. Cie. De Transports OceaniquesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.