Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Cox v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1959No. L. A. 25484PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Petitioners seek a writ of prohibition to compel the respondent court to desist from further proceedings in the trial of issues raised by the second amended counterclaim and cross-complaint brought against petitioners by the real parties in interest.

Petitioners Cox and Pollock brought representative actions on behalf of two painters’ unions (Orange Belt District Council of Painters No. 48 and Painters Local Union No. 775) against Frank A. Calhoun, individually, and Frank A. Calhoun and Elmer Bickmore, partners, painting contractors, and the real parties in interest herein, for breach of a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. McCarroll v. Los Angeles County District Council of CarpentersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Rabouin v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. PadfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Global Packaging, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Malone v. Western Conference of Teamsters Pension TrustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Mora v. Webcor Constr., L.P., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API