Legal Opinion
DiCesare v. Stuart
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1993No. 93-5019PublishedCited by 142 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANE, Senior District Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.RApp.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff-appellant Joseph Angelo DiCesare appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants on his civil rights complaint, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because the district court erred in concluding that defendants complied with the law, and because several…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by142 opinions
- Fabrikant v. FrenchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Toby J. Espinoza v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Abdulhaseeb v. CalboneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Mayfield v. BethardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Gagan v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.