Wiltz v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEARS, Justice.
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the offense of attempted aggravated sexual assault. He was found guilty by a jury and the court assessed punishment at ten years probation and ordered restitution in the amount of $6,590.00. We reverse and remand.
Appellant asserts three points of error on appeal. In his second point of error, Appellant maintains the trial court erred in failing to sustain his Batson challenge to the jury based upon the prosecutor’s exercise of its peremptory strikes to strike all of the black veniremen from the jury panel.
The record shows that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Daniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wiltz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Wiltz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Commonwealth v. LloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. LloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- George Washington Hicks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.