Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Country Squire Mobile Homes, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 31, 1985No. 0569PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

This is an action for breach of contract accompanied by a fraudulent act. Shirley and Mae Floyd, the plaintiffs, obtained a jury verdict for $2,998.63 actual damages and $10,000 punitive damages against the defendant, Country Squire Mobile Homes, Inc. Country Squire appeals from the denial of its motions for an involuntary nonsuit and a directed verdict. It also takes exception to the trial judge’s refusal to give certain requested jury charges. We affirm.

Where appeal is taken from refusal to grant a nonsuit or a directed verdict, this Court must view the evidence and all…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Welborn v. DixonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  2. Holland v. Spartanburg Herald-Journal Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. Knobelock v. Germania Savings BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  4. Kennedy v. CarterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  5. Smith v. Canal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Lister v. NationsBankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Greene v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
  3. Harper v. EthridgeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Armstrong v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Vanwyk Textile Systems, B v. v. Zimmer MacHinery America, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API