Legal Opinion
Grohowski v. U.E. Systems, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 11, 1996No. 93 CV 0131, 93 CV 6305 (BDP)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
PARKER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Charles T. Forde and Paul R. Grohowski, bring this action against defendants U.E. Systems Incorporated, U.E. Systems Money Inc. Purchase Plan, National Pension Service, Inc. under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Grohowski also sues Terrence O’Hanlon and Michael Osterer. Plaintiffs seek to recover penalties and attorneys fees. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
FACTS
The plaintiffs, Paul Grohowski and Charles Forde,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Harriet Ramseur v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Arthur Chambless and Mildred H. Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lacoparra v. Pergament Home Centers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- S.M. v. Oxford Health Plans (N.Y.), Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- McDonald v. Pension Plan of the NYSA-ILA Pension Trust FundDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001