Legal Opinion

Karr v. Blay

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 9, 1976No. Civ. C72-447PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

DON J. YOUNG, District Judge:

This cause comes to be heard upon motion of plaintiffs for summary judgment. Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and (4) which empower this Court to hear actions to redress deprivations, under color of state law, of federal rights and to grant appropriate relief. The Court is authorized to grant declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and further relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2202 and 2283. This cause of action arises under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which is too well known to be required to be set forth in full herein.

I

What…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JeffersOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Zuranski v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1984
  3. State v. MeyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Lloyd D. Alkire v. Judge Jane IrvingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. State v. BossticOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API