Lofther v. First Nat. Bank of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
On October 16, 1941, this cause was before me on a motion to strike certain portions of the original complaint, which motion, so far as it referred to claims of persons other than the individuals named as plaintiffs, was allowed, and the suit was permitted to “proceed on behalf of the present named plaintiffs, and all others who show that they are ‘similarly situated’ and indicate that they desire to join with the named plaintiffs as parties to this action, or to intervene, or who designate an agent or representative to maintain such action On their behalf.” 45…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lofther v. First Nat. Bank of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1941
- Cochran v. Florida Nat. Bldg. Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1942
- Johnson v. Filstow, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1942
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cannon v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Convey v. Omaha Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Callus v. 10 East Fortieth Street Bldg., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- J. Robert Sealy v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Baum v. A. C. Office Building Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.