Legal Opinion
Callus v. 10 East Fortieth Street Bldg., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 28, 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
Fifty-one plaintiffs brought this action on behalf of themselves and other employees and former employees of the defendant 10 East 40th Street Building, Inc., similarly situated for the recovery authorized by Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.
The statute will hereinafter be referred to as the “Act”.
The case was tried by the Court without a jury on March 16, 18, 19, 22, 23 and 24.
At the opening of the trial the action was severed as to the defendant Cross & Brown Company and the 10 East 40th Street Building Corporation will…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Emil v. HanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- 10 East 40th Street Building, Inc. v. CallusSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Convey v. Omaha Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- McComb v. TurpinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1948
- Borella v. Borden Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Building Service Employees International Union, Local No. 238 v. Trenton Trust Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.