Legal Opinion

Loud v. O'Brien

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1911No. Docket No. 110PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Alcona; Connine, J. Bill by Henry N. Loud against Michael O’Brien and James Francis, copartners as O’Brien & Francis, to redeem from the purchase of certain State tax lands. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

In 1905, Henry N. Loud, of Au Sable, Mich., became and was the owner in fee simple of the N. W. i of the N. E. ¿ of section 8, town 27 N., range 6 E., Alcona county, State of Michigan. The lands are wild lands. In July, 1907, the defendants Michael O’Brien and James Francis obtained from the State of *207Michigan tax deeds for the N. W. £ of the N. E. £ and the S. £ of the N. E. £ of section 8, town 27 N., range 6 E., for the taxes of 1883 to 1905, inclusive.. On August 26, 1908, the defendants served upon complainant what purported to be a notice by purchaser under tax sale. This notice was not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haney v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Smith v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Flint Land Co. v. GodkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Kennedy v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. WheatleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  2. Closser v. McBrideMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Rogers v. DavisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Closser v. Hanson Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API