People v. Gusti
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. R. F. Crawford, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
C.Section 397 of the Penal Code, as ¡amended in 1893, provides: “ Every person .... who ■sells or furnishes, or causes to be sold or furnished, intoxicating liquors to any Indian, is guilty of a felony.”
An information was filed against the defendant, which charged as follows: “The said N. Gusti, on the twentieth day of April, A. D. 1895, at and in the county of Sonoma, state of California, did willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously furnish, and cause to be furnished, intoxicating liquor, to wit, wine, to an Indian, to wit, Molinda Dugan, contrary to the form, force, and effect of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- People v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- People v. GossetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. HarroldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. ClemettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- People v. McClennegenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Pyles v. BolesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
- Bealmear v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. PlathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.