Legal Opinion

Ashland Oil, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Cross-Appellant, and United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee, Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 14, 1979No. 79-1009, 79-1096 and 79-1108PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

This case was remanded for the development of additional facts relating to and to provide a basis for the valuation of the helium at the wellhead by the use of a work-back method. See Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 554 F.2d 381 (10th Cir.). The trial court was to determine a proper starting place and value for such method, the plant cost, return on investment, the costs chargeable to production of liquid hydrocarbons, and related facts.

On remand the trial court selected as a starting point the stated value of helium used in the contract between Phillips and the Government.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hysell v. Iowa Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. Ashland Oil, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Phillips Petroleum Company v. United States of America, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. John Deere Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. James Turner, and Cross-Appellee v. Japan Lines, Ltd., and Philippine President Lines Inc., Manila, and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  5. William Cordero v. Juan De Jesus-Mendez, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API