Brosseau v. Jacobs' Pharmacy Co.

When this case was last before us the facts, as they then appeared, were fully reported. Brosseau v. Jacobs’ Pharmacy Co, 147 Ga. 185 (93 S. E. 293). Because of the admission of parol testimony varying the terms of the written contracts, the judgment refusing a new trial was set aside. The contracts sought to be canceled were then held to be separate contracts, and not dependent one upon the other. It was held that they were unambiguous and complete, and that the evidence on the admission of which error ivas assigned did vary the written contracts. Before the return of the remittitur the…