Legal Opinion

S. & S. Builders, Inc. v. Equitable Investment Corp.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 14, 1964No. 22145PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mobley, Justice.

The allegations of the petition, as amended (summarized above), clearly show that the oral construction loan agreement was one of three provisions of a single verbal agreement, the other two of which were later reduced to writing, as the petition alleges plainly and unequivocally that the parties, after considerable negotiations, entered into a verbal agreement to do the three things enumerated and that upon the execution of the written contract, two were reduced to writing but the third was not. The stated objectives of the parties, agreed upon after considerable negotiations…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Forsyth Manufacturing Co. v. CastlenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Dorsey v. ClementsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Stonecypher v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Jackson v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Langenback v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Barclays Bank D. C. O. v. Mercantile National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Liquidator for the Hamilton National Bank of Chattanooga v. Lattimore Land CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Clinton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Schwartz v. Harris Waste Management Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. Adamson v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API