Stonecypher v. Georgia Power Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Knox, Judge.
The rule of law that the terms of a valid written agreement, which is complete and the terms of which are not ambiguous, can not be contradicted, added to, altered, or varied by parol agreements, is a settled legal proposition. It was well established at common law, and has been embodied in the statutory law of this State. It has also been consistently followed with approval by the courts of last resort in this and other jurisdictions. The purpose of the rule is to establish the finality of written contracts, and its wisdom is not a debatable question. As stated in one of the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Peacock v. HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Tippins v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Wellmaker v. WheatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Anderson v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Langenback v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Smith v. Standard Oil CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Cottle v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- McKee v. CartledgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. WillcoxonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.