Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

(HC) Ashanti v. State of California

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 13, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02647Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ASKIA SANKOFA ASHANTI, No. 2:24-cv-02647-DC-EFB (HC) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 18 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus under

28 U.S.C. § 19

1651. In addition to the petition, he has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 20 2. Examination of the affidavit reveals petitioner is unable to afford the costs of this action. 21 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that leave…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Hernandez v. TanninenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API