Legal Opinion

Knutzen v. Truck Insurance Exchange

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1939No. 27422. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Prior to the commencement of this action, a judgment was obtained against the present plaintiff in a suit brought to recover damages for the death of a person who had been struck by a motor vehicle owned and operated by plaintiff. After satisfying that judgment, plaintiff commenced this suit for indemnity against defendant herein upon its policy of liability and collision insurance issued to plaintiff prior to the time of the collision. Upon a trial of the present action by the court, findings of fact were made, conclusions of law were established, and a judgment in favor of plaintiff was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Travelers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Butler v. Supreme CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Raynor v. Scandinavian-American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Eakle v. HayesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Bergson v. Builders Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1869

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WachsmithWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Glaspey & Sons, Inc. v. ConradWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Department of Labor & Industries v. Northwestern Mutual Fire Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. J. A. Campbell Co. v. Holsum Baking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Reliance Insurance Co. v. EcholsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API