Legal Opinion

Robert WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sammy DRAKE; United States of America, Defendants-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1996No. 94-56428PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether a federal employer is entitled to immunity for intentional torts allegedly committed by one of its employees against another on a government installation in California.

I

Robert Wilson is an engineer at the Naval Air Warfare Center in Point Mugu, California; Sammy Drake is his immediate supervisor. In June 1993, Wilson filed a complaint in California state court against Drake in his individual capacity for “injury to reputation, battery, violation of personal space.” 1

Wilson alleges that on one occasion in June 1992, Drake allegedly came to his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gutierrez De Martinez v. LamagnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
  5. John R. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Blair G. McLachlan v. James Bell Michael George Charles Smith, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Araceli Rodriguez v. Lonnie SwartzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Sameena Inc. v. United States Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Erlinda Ubaldo Clamor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Grantham v. DurantDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API