Legal Opinion

Erlinda Ubaldo Clamor v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 2, 2001No. 00-15124PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge HAWKINS; Dissent by Judge TALLMAN.

MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:

Erlinda Clamor appeals the district court’s dismissal of her tort claim which arose from a car accident on the Pearl Harbor Naval Base with James Karagior-gis, a civilian employee. The district court concluded that Karagiorgis had been acting within the scope of his employment as a federal employee at the time of the accident, and that therefore the case was governed by the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). The district court dismissed the case because Clamor had failed to exhaust her administrative…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Robert J. Pelletier v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, and John W. BehrensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Sean T. Haddon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. Wong-Leong v. Hawaiian Independent Refinery, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Henderson v. Professional Coatings Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Tilden R. Wilkinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Blair G. McLachlan v. James Bell Michael George Charles Smith, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Kashin v. KentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Wood v. WaltonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  4. Sharrock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Daugherty v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API