Legal Opinion

Leonard & Harral Packing Co. v. Ward

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1997No. 94-1184PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In Transportation Insurance Co. v. Moriel, 879 S.W.2d 10, 31 (Tex.1994), we held “that the court of appeals, when conducting a factual sufficiency review of a punitive damages award, must hereafter detail the relevant evidence in its opinion, explaining why that evidence either supports or does not support the punitive damages award in light of the [Alamo National Bank v. Kraus, 616 S.W.2d 908, 910 (Tex.1981)] factors.” In Ellis County State Bank v. Keener, 888 S.W.2d 790, 799 (Tex.1994), we held that the review required by Moriel “should be applied to a pending case in which a party…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Alamo National Bank v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Haynes & Boone v. Bowser Bouldin, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Ellis County State Bank v. KeeverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Leonard & Harral Packing Co. v. Ward, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1994

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Houston Livestock Show & Rodeo, Inc. v. Hamrick, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Vandiver, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  3. Leonard & Harral Packing Co. v. Ward, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API