Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Fire & Marine Insurance v. Fields

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 28, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeWITT, J.

This action was begun by E. A. Fields on August 16, 1929 to recover the sum of $1000, with interest from March 18, 1929 and a penalty, upon a policy of insurance effected March 29, 1928 against fire -upon a dwelling house in the town of Kingsport. The house was totally destroyed by fire on January 18, 1929.

The policy was issued to Kassem and Shaheen as the owners, but with the loss clause attached thereto providing, “loss if any to be adjusted with the insured named herein any payable to the insured and E. A. Fields as their respective interests may appear, subject nevertheless to all the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Insurance Cos. v. EstesTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Edington v. Michigan Mutual Life InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Donaldson v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Bockman v. Mutual Health Benefit & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. First Investment Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  3. Wattenbarger v. TullockTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  4. U.S. Bank, N.A., as Servicer for the Tennessee Housing Development Agency v. Tennessee Farmenrs Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API