Insurance Cos. v. Estes
Tennessee Supreme Court
1'EOM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Davidson County.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAltsxee, J.
These actions were commenced separately to recover on policies of fire insurance. The same questions being involved in both suits, they were consolidated in the Court below and beard together. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment against each company for the sum of $1,000, the amount of its policy, with interest. Both companies appealed, and have assigned errors.
The declarations allege that on the thirteenth of February, 1899, the defendant companies issued to the plaintiff, E. M. Estes, policies of fire insurance for the sum of $1,000 each on a certain *474mill building, machinery, etc.,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Davis v. Richardson & MayMississippi Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by17 opinions
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Continental Fire Insurance v. WhitakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Matthews v. Capital Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Hughes v. Millers' Mut. Fire. Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- Kimball Ice Co. v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.