Legal Opinion

Hamlett v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 28, 1992No. S92A0227PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Weltner, Presiding Justice.

A petition under the Recall Act of 1989 as amended (OCGA § 21-4-1 et seq.) was filed against a county school board member.

Factual background

The trial court reviewed the sufficiency of the petition as provided in OCGA § 21-4-6, as amended, and held that the allegations of the petition were “insufficient to justify the holding of a recall election.” We granted discretionary review.

Pleading requirement

1. OCGA § 21-4-6 (f), as amended, provides for judicial review:

Such review shall be limited solely to a review of the legal sufficiency of the recall ground or grounds…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allison v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  2. Steele v. HoneaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brooks v. BranchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Davis v. ShaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Phillips v. HawthorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Davis v. ShaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Davis v. ShaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API