Hamlett v. Hubbard
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Weltner, Presiding Justice.
A petition under the Recall Act of 1989 as amended (OCGA § 21-4-1 et seq.) was filed against a county school board member.
Factual background
The trial court reviewed the sufficiency of the petition as provided in OCGA § 21-4-6, as amended, and held that the allegations of the petition were “insufficient to justify the holding of a recall election.” We granted discretionary review.
Pleading requirement
1. OCGA § 21-4-6 (f), as amended, provides for judicial review:
Such review shall be limited solely to a review of the legal sufficiency of the recall ground or grounds…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Allison v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Steele v. HoneaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brooks v. BranchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Davis v. ShaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Phillips v. HawthorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Davis v. ShaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Davis v. ShaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.