Davis v. Shavers
Supreme Court of Georgia
1DissentFletcher, Presiding Justice
By holding that voters who file a recall application have only a conditional privilege, the majority has unnecessarily eroded the right of recall. Few individuals will sign a recall petition, much less lead a recall effort, when they may face the possibility of a libel action for their participation. Because the court’s opinion will have a chilling effect on political speech and the recall statute already provides sufficient safeguards to protect elected officials from false allegations, I dissent.
1. The Recall Act of 1989 outlines the procedure for seeking recall of public officials.1 To…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Fedderwitz v. LambSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Cox Enterprises, Inc. v. Carroll City/County Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Collins v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.