Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davis v. Shavers

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 26, 1998No. S97G1113Published

1DissentFletcher, Presiding Justice

By holding that voters who file a recall application have only a conditional privilege, the majority has unnecessarily eroded the right of recall. Few individuals will sign a recall petition, much less lead a recall effort, when they may face the possibility of a libel action for their participation. Because the court’s opinion will have a chilling effect on political speech and the recall statute already provides sufficient safeguards to protect elected officials from false allegations, I dissent.

1. The Recall Act of 1989 outlines the procedure for seeking recall of public officials.1 To…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Fedderwitz v. LambSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Cox Enterprises, Inc. v. Carroll City/County Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  5. Collins v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API