Legal Opinion

Nelson v. River Valley Bank & Trust

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 9, 1998No. 97-1367Published

1Opinion of the Court

971 S.W.2d 777 (1998)

334 Ark. 172

Cecil and Leona NELSON, Appellant,

v.

RIVER VALLEY BANK & TRUST, Appellee.

No. 97-1367.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

July 9, 1998.

Oscar Stilley, Fort Smith, for Appellant.

J. Michael Cogbill, Virginia C. Trammell, Fort Smith, for Appellee.

IMBER, Justice.

The appellants, Cecil and Leona Nelson, claimed that a demand note issued by the appellee, River Valley Bank and Trust, was usurious because the interest rate was more than five percentage points above the federal discount rate. The trial court granted summary judgment to River Valley because it held that federal law…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Adams v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Pender v. McKeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Security Pacific Housing Services, Inc. v. FriddleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Nelson v. River Valley Bank & TrustSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API