Legal Opinion
National Union Fire Insurance v. Coric
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided May 6, 1996No. 6:96-mj-00312PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
MeAVOY, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (“National Union”), commenced this action by filing a complaint “in the nature of interpleader” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1335 on February 21, 1996. National Union seeks relief against defendants Drzislav Coric, Theresa Higgins, Herbert Karp, Matthew Massaro and Kerrie Rogers, each of whom claim — or may claim— an interest in a $5 million insurance policy issued by National Union. National Union has moved for an injunction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2361 restraining…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. TashireSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lappe v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Company Of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Herbert KarpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Gemological Institute of America, Inc. v. Trang Thi-Dai PhanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. KarpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Cortez v. CMG Worldwide Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Canal Insurance v. MorganDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.