Legal Opinion

Shatzer v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1997No. OTC 3807; SC S43152PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

The Department of Revenue (the department) appeals a decision of the Oregon Tax Court granting taxpayers’ motion for summary judgment. The Tax Court concluded that Article XI, section lib, of the Oregon Constitution 1 (section lib), a voter-approved property tax limitation, requires that the assessed value of taxpayers’ property reflect changes in the condition of the property that occur after July 1. Shatzer v. Dept. of Rev., 13 OTR 436, 440-41 (1996). We affirm.

The subject property is taxpayers’ personal residence. The assessed value of the property on July 1, 1993, was $198,500, with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Roseburg School District v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Bernstein Bros. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Coultas v. City of SutherlinOregon Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flavorland Foods v. Washington County AssessorOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Lombardo v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Kailes v. Josephine County AssessorOregon Tax Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API