Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Roth v. Ryan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The respondent (plaintiff below) filed no brief in this court. Therefore, the appeal is not decided on the merits, but the judgment is reversed pursuant to sec. (Rule) 251.57, Stats., which provides:

“When a cause is submitted, or presented by counsel for appellant or plaintiff in error, but not by the opposing party, the judgment or order appealed from may be reversed as of course, without argument.”

For other decisions which have reversed as of course under this rule, see Cihlar v. Harvey (1965), 27 Wis. (2d) 269, 133 N. W. (2d) 815; State v. Seymour (1964), 24 Wis. (2d) 258, 262, 128 N. W.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SeymourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Fuller v. FiedlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Cihlar v. HarveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Ohnstad v. Union State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State Ex Rel. Gresholdt v. Board of AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walder v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Essbro Seamless Floors, Inc. v. SitzbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API