Legal Opinion

Cihlar v. Harvey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The question of whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial is the sole issue presented.

From our review of the entire record, the brief and argument of the plaintiff are quite persuasive. However, because we have not had the benefit of a brief or oral argument from defendants, we decline to pass upon the matter on its merits but reverse under the statutory procedural rule.

Supreme Court Rule 57, sec. 251.57, Stats., provides:

“When a cause is submitted, or presented by counsel for appellant or plaintiff in error, but not by the opposing party, the judgment or order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. S & T MOTORS v. General Motors Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Fuller v. FiedlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Long v. WallmowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Ohnstad v. Union State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kull v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State ex rel. Roth v. RyanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API