Munal Clinic v. Applegate
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.
This suit for declaratory judgment was filed by the Munal Clinic and its owner, Dr. John Munal, assureds, hereinafter referred to in the singular as complainant, against the defendants, New Amsterdam Casualty Company, W. 0. Applegate, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of W. O. Applegate, Sr., and Messrs. Dodson and Dodson, Attorneys of the Kingsport Bar, to determine whether the New Amsterdam Casualty Company, hereinafter referred to as defendant or insurer, was obligated under a policy contract issued to the complainant to defend an action at law filed .against complainant by W. O'.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Carpenter v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Parker v. Bethel Hotel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Spradlin v. Columbia Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
- Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. v. EnglandTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chattem, Inc. v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Reliance Insurance Co. v. Athena Cablevision Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Dr. John H. Sohm v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- North River Insurance Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- Day v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.