Legal Opinion

Hodgson v. Arnheim & Neely, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 15, 1971No. Nos. 18772-18774PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

In this case, we are asked to decide whether a real estate management company which operates and maintains, but does not own, certain commercial buildings is an employer whose activities are regulated by the Fair Labor Standards Act as amended.

The Secretary of Labor sought an injunction in the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania under § 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., to enjoin Arn-heim and Neely, Inc. (Company) from violating the minimum wage, overtime, and record keeping provisions of the Act, and to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. HargraveCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Donovan v. AgnewCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  2. Haybarger v. Lawrence County Adult Probation & ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. Campusano v. Lusitano Construction LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Kilvitis v. County of LuzerneDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Bonnette v. California Health & Welfare AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API