Legal Opinion
Murray v. Xerox Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 4, 1987No. 274, Docket 86-7554PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Joseph Murray appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, Telesca, J., following an order granting defendant Xerox Corporation’s motion for summary judgment as to all claims and dismissing the complaint. Murray, a fourteen year employee of Xerox Corporation, brought this action in the district court alleging, under New York law, that Xerox made fraudulent and negligent misrepresentations concerning promotions and transfers within the company. Murray also alleged that he was the victim of employment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- James Williams v. Harold J. Smith, Superintendent, and W. Morgan, C.O., Attica Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Hydro Investors, Inc. v. Trafalgar Power Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Andrew Chen and Chen Printing and Supply Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- McAlister v. CitibankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- 80 Nassau Associates v. Crossland Federal Savings Bank (In Re 80 Nassau Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.