Legal Opinion

People v. Bedessie

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2012PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Read, J.

In this appeal, we are asked for the first time to consider the admissibility of expert testimony proffered on the issue of the reliability of a confession. While in a proper case expert testimony on the phenomenon of false confessions should be admitted, the expert here did not propose testimony relevant to this defendant or her interrogation. As a result, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion when he declined to hold a Frye hearing to assess whether any principles about which the expert proposed to testify were generally accepted in the scientific…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. People v. LeGrandNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Warney v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. BedessieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. RosarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. JeremiahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. People v. JoubertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Hughes v. SheahanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2018
  5. People v. HeyligerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API