Legal Opinion
Acrotube, Inc. v. J.K. Financial Group, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided January 7, 1987No. Civ. A. 85-3982aPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHOOB, District Judge.
The above-styled case involves a real estate venture gone bad. Pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., plaintiff Acrotube, Inc. (“Acrotube”) seeks partial summary judgment against defendant J.K. Florida Development, Inc. (“J.K. Florida”). Defendants J.K. Financial Group, Inc., J.K. Financial Corporation, and John E. Kearney (“Kear-ney”) (referred to collectively as “the other defendants”) have moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P., or, in the alternative, to transfer the action under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Also before the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gundle Lining Construction Corp. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1994
- Fort Hill Builders, Inc. v. National Grange Mutual Insurance Co., Carl L. DwormanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Electronic Transaction Network v. KatzDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1989
- Applegate v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- State Street Capital Corp. v. DenteDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.