Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Ford Motor Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 2011No. 49A02-1007-CT-823PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

James and Nancy Taylor filed a negligence claim in Marion Superior Court against Arthur Adams (“Adams”), Automotive Components Holdings, LLC (“ACH”), and Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) (collectively “the Defendants”). The trial court subsequently granted the Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Taylors appeal and argue that the trial court did have subject matter jurisdiction.

We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

James Taylor (“James”) worked at the Ford factory on English Avenue in Indianapolis for approximately thirty years and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Romine v. GagleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Hale v. KempIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kinslow v. GEICO Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Kenwal Steel Corp. v. SeyringIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Outboard Boating Club of Evansville, Inc. v. Indiana State Department of HealthIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Eshanya Walls v. Markley Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. F.D. v. Indiana Department of Family ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. F.D., G.D., and T.D. b/n/f J.D. and M.D. J.D. and M.D., Individually v. Indiana Dept. of Family Services, Vanderburgh Co. Office of Family & Social Services, Evansville Police Dept.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API