William G. Riplinger v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Riplinger, a contract analyst for the Department of the Navy, was recruited from the private sector with the express representation that he would be employed initially at grade GS-11, step 10. Through a series of administrative errors, none attributable to Riplinger, necessary government approval for step increases was not obtained, and the maximum pay authorized by statute and regulations was GS-11, step 1. In grade GS-11, the pay for step 1 is considerably less than for step 10.
Riplinger learned of his appointment at grade GS-11, step 1, after he had entered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Leonard J. Ganse v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Adolph Kizas v. William H. Webster, Adolph Kizas v. William H. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Plowman v. United States Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
- James Hayes, Jr. v. United States Postal Service and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Massie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Reeder v. FrankDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.