Legal Opinion

William G. Riplinger v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1983No. 81-3626PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Riplinger, a contract analyst for the Department of the Navy, was recruited from the private sector with the express representation that he would be employed initially at grade GS-11, step 10. Through a series of administrative errors, none attributable to Riplinger, necessary government approval for step increases was not obtained, and the maximum pay authorized by statute and regulations was GS-11, step 1. In grade GS-11, the pay for step 1 is considerably less than for step 10.

Riplinger learned of his appointment at grade GS-11, step 1, after he had entered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Shaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. Leonard J. Ganse v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Adolph Kizas v. William H. Webster, Adolph Kizas v. William H. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Plowman v. United States Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
  3. James Hayes, Jr. v. United States Postal Service and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Massie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  5. Reeder v. FrankDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API