Legal Opinion

Scott v. New Empire Insurance

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1965No. 7530PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMODY, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from a directed verdict in favor of the plaintiff below. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

The real question in the case is one involving the interpretation of the meaning of the words “accidental means” in a policy of accident insurance.

Plaintiff’s decedent was the insured under an accident policy issued by the defendant. On the face of the policy, in boldface type, appear the words, “ACCIDENTAL DEATH, ACCIDENTAL INJURY" AND ACCIDENTAL HOSPITALIZATION POLICY.” Also on the face of the policy, but in slightly less boldface…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Brenneman v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Thompson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Tipton v. ClowerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Murphy v. Travelers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. HeywardTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Beckham v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. INA Life Insurance Company v. BrundinAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Harrell v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Freeman v. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. of LouisvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API