Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Travelers Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1942No. 31078PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is a suit to recover benefits under the provisions of two policies of accident insurance. At the close of all the *42evidence both parties moved for a directed verdict. The trial court sustained the motion of the defendant and entered a judgment against the plaintiff. From this judgment the plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff was a dentist. For twenty years prior to the date of the alleged accident he had used an X-ray machine .in the practice of his profession. In taking X-ray photographs it had long been his practice to insert the index finger of his left hand in the patient’s mouth in order…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  4. Rathbun v. Globe Indemnity Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Pickett v. Pacific M. L. Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Warren County1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Canadian Radium & Uranium Corp. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Harrell v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Carroll v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. Freeman v. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. of LouisvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Knight v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API