Legal Opinion
State v. Wajda
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 30, 1973No. 43583PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacLaughlin, Justice.
Defendant, convicted by a district court jury of violating Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, § 402.080, which prohibits driving after revocation or suspension of a driver’s license, appeals from the judgment of conviction. We affirm.
At trial the only factual dispute was over who had driven the automobile, defendant or his friend, Mary Jo Shake. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial eourt erred in permitting one of the arresting officers to testify that defendant had confessed that he, and not Miss Shake, had driven the automobile. We hold that the trial court did…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. SchabertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- State v. KeiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. PilcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. FossenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.