Legal Opinion

Heyroth v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The new criminal code (Title XLV, Stats. 1955) did not take effect until July 1, 1956, so that the 1953 statutes are applicable to the instant prosecution. Sec. 343.19, Stats. 1953, under which Heyroth was charged, reads as follows:

“Any person who shall buy, receive, conceal, or aid in the concealment of stolen money, goods, or property, knowing the same to have been stolen, shall receive the same punishment as is hereinbefore provided for the stealing of such money, goods, or property; and in any prosecution for such offense it shall not be necessary to aver or prove that the person who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Koch v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Meath v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. ClementiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GabrielSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. White v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. SpragginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Dascenzo v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. AppletreeConnecticut Superior Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API