Legal Opinion
Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Coe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 28, 1938No. 6894PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
96 F.2d 518 (1938)
PROCTOR & GAMBLE CO.
v.
COE.
No. 6894.
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Decided February 28, 1938.
Rehearing Denied March 26, 1938.
Frederick D. McKenney and C. Russel Riordon, both of Washington, D.C., for appellant.
R. F. Whitehead, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Joshua R. H. Potts, Basel H. Brune, and Eugene Vincent Clarke, all of Philadelphia, Pa., amici curiæ.
Before GRONER, STEPHENS, and MILLER, Associate Justices.
MILLER, Associate Justice.
On October 26, 1931, a petition was filed in the Patent Office by…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hammond v. HullCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Gerald Glen Boyden v. Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Mallory Coal Co. v. National Bituminous Coal CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Fred A. Seaton, Individually and as Secretary of the Interior v. The Texas Company, John Snyder v. The Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Farley v. HeiningerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.