Burck v. Buchen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.
This action involves a forged promissory note for $25,000 dated March 21, 1938, due ninety days after date with interest at 6% per annum, in favor of George D. Smart and purportedly signed by Louis B. Mayer. On the reverse side of the note was a written guaranty of payment signed by the payee and a certificate of acknowledgment of appellant Buchen, a notary public, to the effect that on March 21, 1938, both Smart and Mayer personally appeared before him and acknowledged the execution of said note. As a matter of fact Mayer was not present when the acknowledgment was taken.
Bespondent Burck…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hatton v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Oakland Bank of Savings v. MurfeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Joost v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Anderson v. AronsohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Overacre v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bank of America v. DowdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Jordan v. O'ConnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- McDonald v. PlumbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Bank of America v. DowdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- In re Aerocolor, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1964