Legal Opinion

Rozgis v. Missouri State Life Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 24, 1933No. Gen. No. 8,688PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shurtleff

This was an action in assumpsit to recover for alleged total and permanent disability under a certificate of insurance. The policy,. a standard form of life insurance, contained the following contract and provision:

“If the Member shall furnish the Company with due proof that before having attained the age of sixty years, he or she has become totally and permanently disabled by bodily injury or disease and that he or she is then, and will be at' all times thereafter, wholly prevented thereby from engaging in any gainful occupation and that he or she has been so permanently and totally disabled…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winnesheik Insurance v. HolzgrafeIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. WebsterIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Niedringhaus v. Aetna InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  4. Harvick v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  5. Pardon v. WasvaryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spence v. Washington National InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  2. Meyers v. MatthewsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Fisher v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  4. Eakins v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. New Hampshire Fire Ins. v. BolerWyoming Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API