Legal Opinion

Pakarinen v. Butler Bros.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 1, 1944No. 33,817PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

Pakarinen sued under the fair labor standards act of 1938 for overtime wages, an equal amount as liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees as provided in the act. The defendant contended that plaintiff was an “executive” and therefore within the exemptions of the act. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict for plaintiff for $2,710.80. This is an appeal from an order denying an alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

Plaintiff was employed by defendant during the period from October 24, 1938, through January 11, 1942, in the Merritt Mine near…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Wilkinson v. Noland Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connell v. Delaware Aircraft Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1947
  2. Cohen v. HirschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Marsh v. Minneapolis Herald, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Urban v. Continental Convention & Show Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Stevens v. Federal Cartridge Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API